The Rhythm of Life
艾丽斯·梅内尔 / Alice Meynell
If life is not always poetical， it is at least metrical. Periodicity rules over the mental experience of man， according to the path of the orbit of his thoughts. Distances are not gauged， ellipses not measured， velocities not ascertained， times not known. Nevertheless， the recurrence is sure. What the mind suffered last week or last year， it does not suffer now； but it will suffer again next week or next year. Happiness is not a matter of events； it depends upon the tides of the mind. Disease is metrical， closing in at shorter and shorter periods towards death， sweeping abroad at longer and longer intervals towards recovery. Sorrow for one cause was intolerable yesterday， and will be intolerable tomorrow； today it is easy to bear， but the cause has not passed. Even the burden of a spiritual distress unsolved is bound to leave the heart to a temporary peace； and remorse itself does not remain — it returns. Gaiety takes us by a dear surprise. If we had made a course of notes of its visits， we might have been on the watch， and would have had an expectation instead of a discovery. No one makes such observations； in all the diaries of students of the interior world， there have never come to light the records of the Kepler of such cycles. But Thomas à Kempis knew of the recurrences， if he did not measure them. In his cell alone with the elements — “What wouldst thou more than these for out of these were all things made”— he learnt the stay to be found in the depth of the hour of bitterness， and the remembrance that restrains the soul at the coming of the moment of delight， giving it a more conscious welcome， but presaging for it an inexorable f？light. And “rarely， rarely comest thou，” sighed Shelley， not to Delight merely， but to the Spirit of Delight. Delight can be compelled beforehand， called， and constrained to our service — Ariel can be bound to a daily task； but such artif？icial violence throws life out of metre， and it is not the spirit that is thus compelled. THAT f？lits upon an orbit elliptically or parabolically or hyperbolically curved， keeping no man knows what trysts with Time.
It seems f？it that Shelley and the author of the IMITATION should both have been keen and simple enough to perceive these f？lights， and to guess at the order of this periodicity. Both souls were in close touch with the spirits of their several worlds， and no deliberate human rules， no infractions of the liberty and law of the universal movement， kept from them the knowledge of recurrences. Eppur simuove. They knew that presence does not exist without absence； they knew that what is just upon its f？light of farewell is already on its long path of return. They knew that what is approaching to the very touch is hastening towards departure.“O wind，” cried Shelley， in autumn，
“O wind，
If winter comes， can spring be far behind？”
They knew that the f？lux is equal to the ref？lux； that to interrupt with unlawful recurrences， out of time， is to weaken the impulse of onset and retreat； the sweep and impetus of movement. To live in constant efforts after an equal life， whether the equality be sought in mental production， or in spiritual sweetness， or in the joy of the senses， is to live without either rest or full activity. The souls of certain of the saints， being singularly simple and single， have been in the most complete subjection to the law of periodicity. Ecstasy and desolation visited them by seasons. They endured， during spaces of vacant time， the interior loss of all for which they had sacrif？iced the world. They rejoiced in the uncovenanted beatitude of sweetness alighting in their hearts. Like them are the poets whom， three times or ten times in the course of a long life， the Muse has approached， touched， and forsaken. And yet hardly like them； not always so docile， nor so wholly prepared for the departure， the brevity， of the golden and irrevocable hour. Few poets have fully recognised the metrical absence of their Muse. For full recognition is expressed in one only way — silence.
